Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.
Date
Msg-id 524C3013.9020903@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.  (Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
On 10/02/2013 05:58 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0000, Albe Laurenz wrote:
>
>>> Or does that still need some C sprinkling (for operator support, say) ?
>>
>> Exactly. If you want "<" to work right for this data type
>> that's the road you have to go.
>
> I see.
>
> Whatever became of the 2011 intent to implement
> the above that's linked to in the blog post ?

Not sure about that, but I do remember this:

http://svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/taggedtypes.html

No indication of whether it will work with 9.x servers though.

>
> Karsten
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioning for speed, but query planner ignores