Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Karsten Hilbert
Subject Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.
Date
Msg-id 20131002125806.GK4431@hermes.hilbert.loc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.
Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0000, Albe Laurenz wrote:

>> Or does that still need some C sprinkling (for operator support, say) ?
>
> Exactly. If you want "<" to work right for this data type
> that's the road you have to go.

I see.

Whatever became of the 2011 intent to implement
the above that's linked to in the blog post ?

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Rysdam
Date:
Subject: partitioning for speed, but query planner ignores
Next
From: David Rysdam
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioning for speed, but query planner ignores