Re: PostgreSQL Timeline - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
Date
Msg-id 5239E08D.7000000@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL Timeline  (damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL Timeline  (MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@gmail.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL Timeline  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 09/18/2013 11:31 AM, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
> Where are the references that Vertica is sort-of a PG fork and that
> Paraccel is a PG fork? Quick searches of the interweb finds claims that
> they are not. Not sure you need to bring doubt to the rest of the details
> in an excellent slide deck.

That depends on your definition of "fork".  There are things which are
forks which are 90% community Postgres code, and things which are 30%
Postgres code.  What percentage makes something a fork, and what
doesn't, and why?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: MARK CALLAGHAN
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
Next
From: MARK CALLAGHAN
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Timeline