Re: [PATCH] reloptions - RELOPT_KIND_ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] reloptions - RELOPT_KIND_ALL
Date
Msg-id 5238.1232723977@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] reloptions - RELOPT_KIND_ALL  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] reloptions - RELOPT_KIND_ALL  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera píše v pá 23. 01. 2009 v 11:04 -0300:
>> Do you have an example use case for this?

> I use it in my space reservation patch. I going to send it soon.

Haven't we been over that ground already?  A user-settable reloption
is not a reasonable solution to a space-reservation problem.  The
potential for errors of commission and omission is too great.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Gupta
Date:
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning Feature
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Controlling hot standby