On Wed, 2024-12-11 at 23:25 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 11, 2024, SASIKUMAR Devaraj <sashikumard@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > When we are running vacuumdb for our database of 1.5TB it is generating approximately 60GB
> > of WAL files? Any way we can reduce this WAL file generation?
>
> Set a much more aggressive autovacuum so you don’t accumulate as much dead tuples between runs?
You can also activate "wal_compression" for smaller full-page images
and increase "max_wal_size" to get fewer of them.
But 60GB of WAL shouldn't be a problem. Why are they a problem for you?
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
