Re: VacuumDB generating huge WAL filed - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From SASIKUMAR Devaraj
Subject Re: VacuumDB generating huge WAL filed
Date
Msg-id 2060427903.1621547.1734006464981@mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VacuumDB generating huge WAL filed  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-admin
Hi

Since it is generating 60GB in few mins, my replication lag is increasing upto 10Gb for around 10 mins, which may seen as possible data loss in case of primary node failure 

Regards
Sasi



On Thursday, December 12, 2024, 12:06 PM, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:

On Wed, 2024-12-11 at 23:25 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:

> On Wednesday, December 11, 2024, SASIKUMAR Devaraj <sashikumard@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > When we are running vacuumdb for our database of 1.5TB it is generating approximately 60GB
> > of WAL files? Any way we can reduce this WAL file generation?
>
> Set a much more aggressive autovacuum so you don’t accumulate as much dead tuples between runs?


You can also activate "wal_compression" for smaller full-page images
and increase "max_wal_size" to get fewer of them.

But 60GB of WAL shouldn't be a problem.  Why are they a problem for you?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: VacuumDB generating huge WAL filed
Next
From: "Narendran .j"
Date:
Subject: Psql not working