Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Date
Msg-id 51EDE7C2.1060607@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
List pgsql-hackers
After pushes from a few people, the remaining submissions are now 
waiting for commit.  I updated each of those to have the latest info in 
the CF app, and tried to identify what committers have already looked at 
them.

Access to calls stack from GET DIAGNOSTICS statement:  ?

Add more regression tests mostly for ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY .. ADD/DROP:  ?  Robert Haas gave a quick review last week
that'sgenerated an 
 
update since.  But that looks it was just a quick scan for issues.

Remove unused targets from plan:  Alvaro?  (He reviewed it already)

SQL Command to edit postgresql.conf ("ALTER SYSTEM" patch):  Alvaro 
volunteered to look at this if no one else gets to it first.

UNNEST() (and other functions) WITH ORDINALITY:  Greg Stark

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Preventing tuple-table leakage in plpgsql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RangeTblEntry.joinaliasvars representation change