On 07/10/2013 09:04 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 07/04/2013 06:11 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
>> Le mercredi 3 juillet 2013 23:56:42, Josh Berkus a écrit :
>>> Peter, Cedric, etc.:
>>>
>>> Where are we on this patch? Seems like discussion died out. Should it
>>> be bounced?
>> I for myself have been presuaded that it is a good idea. Things apparently loosed are not, it just outline that we
needbetter coverage in PGXS area, so it is another thing to consider (TODO : add resgress test for PGXS ...)
>>
> To be more focused: is this patch going to be committed in the next 4
> days or not? If not, it's time to mark it "returned" so we can have
> leisurely spec argument later.
I think that would probably be the better course. I'm not sure there is
a consensus about this.
cheers
andrew
>
