Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
Date
Msg-id 51A60620.2010505@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 5/28/13 10:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u. 
> Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4?  I can keep supporting -u
> as an undocumented option.

It seems to me that that option shouldn't be necessary anyway.
pg_upgrade should somehow be able to find out by itself what the
superuser of the old cluster was.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ray Stell
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: GRANT role_name TO role_name ON database_name