Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
Date
Msg-id 20130628220611.GB13790@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:44:00AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/28/13 10:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u. 
> > Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4?  I can keep supporting -u
> > as an undocumented option.
> 
> It seems to me that that option shouldn't be necessary anyway.
> pg_upgrade should somehow be able to find out by itself what the
> superuser of the old cluster was.

Uh, any idea how to do that?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: New regression test time
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: backend hangs at immediate shutdown (Re: Back-branch update releases coming in a couple weeks)