On 04/08/2013 04:32 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 04/08/2013 04:12 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>
>> Clearly we can't do it that way again.
>>
>> -core is currently hashing out thoughts on what might be a reasonable
>> early notification process for high-risk users, and if it's feasible for
>> us to have one. As well as other aspects of our security release
>> procedure.
>>
>
> I think that one thing that is very important to remember here, is -core
> doesn't make decisions lightly. I understand that some may have felt
> that communication wasn't perfect (it wasn't) but I know several members
> of core and they all take the position IMHO too seriously. So let's
> relax, realize there is improvement to be made (which they and we do)
> and just work the problem.
Agreed. As far as I can see things where handled in the Postgres way,
when in doubt err on the side of caution. I applaud the efforts of those
concerned and trust in their ability to build on the experience.
>
> The rest is just noise.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> JD
>
>
>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com
