Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables
Date
Msg-id 5160B48F.3040306@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables  (Vibhor Kumar <vibhor.kumar@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/04/2013 01:03 PM, Vibhor Kumar wrote:
> I did some testing on this patch with 9.1 and 9.2 source code. Testing included following:
> 1. Configured PostGIS with 9.1 and 9.2
> 2. verified all switches of pg_dump with regression db.
> 3. Checked other extensions, to verify if this impacting those. 
> 
> Everything is working as expected and I haven't found any issue during my test with this patch.

Thanks Vibhor. Any other comments or concerns before I commit this?

> While testing this patch, some thoughts came in my mind and thought to share on this thread. 
> Is it possible, if we can have two switches for extension in pg_dump:
> 1. extension dump with user data in extension tables.
> 2. User data-only dump from extensions.

This might be worth considering for 9.4

Thanks,

Joe

-- 
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Process title for autovac