Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Subject Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
Date
Msg-id 5151FE1B.7040505@kaltenbrunner.cc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/26/2013 08:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
>> I finally started to investigate why spoonbill stopped reporting to the
>> buildfarm feedback about 2 months ago.
>> It seems that the foreign-keys locking patch (or something commity very
>> close to January 23th) broke it in a fairly annoying way - running the
>> buildfarm script seems to
>> consistently "stall" during the isolationtester part of the regression
>> testing leaving the postgresql instance running causing all future
>> buildfarm runs to fail...
> 
> It looks from here like the isolationtester client is what's dropping
> the ball --- the backend states are unsurprising, and two of them are
> waiting for a new client command.  Can you get a stack trace from the
> isolationtester process?


https://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/isolationtester.txt


Stefan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: sql_drop Event Triggerg
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add PF_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE to on_exit_msg_fmt.