Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
Date
Msg-id 18421.1364327149@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to spoonbill vs. -HEAD  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Responses Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> I finally started to investigate why spoonbill stopped reporting to the
> buildfarm feedback about 2 months ago.
> It seems that the foreign-keys locking patch (or something commity very
> close to January 23th) broke it in a fairly annoying way - running the
> buildfarm script seems to
> consistently "stall" during the isolationtester part of the regression
> testing leaving the postgresql instance running causing all future
> buildfarm runs to fail...

It looks from here like the isolationtester client is what's dropping
the ball --- the backend states are unsurprising, and two of them are
waiting for a new client command.  Can you get a stack trace from the
isolationtester process?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: sql_drop Event Triggerg
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL)