Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables
Date
Msg-id 51506596.6060501@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables  (Vibhor Kumar <vibhor.kumar@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/14/2013 05:23 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 04:16 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>>> I think it should dump the user data portion, especially since that
>>> matches what pg_dump would do if you did not specify the table or schema.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> If you don't have time slots to fix that by then, I will have a look at
>> fixing that while in beta.
>
> Here is a patch against 9.1. If there is agreement with the approach
> I'll redo for 9.2 and git head and apply.

Any objections before I commit this?

Thanks,

Joe

--

--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brendan Jurd
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL)
Next
From: Steve Singer
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade segfaults when given an invalid PGSERVICE value