Re: PG V9 on NFS - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: PG V9 on NFS
Date
Msg-id 511AC0DB.8020109@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG V9 on NFS  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: PG V9 on NFS  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-general
On 2/12/2013 5:28 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> And don't even consider it without a high-end dedicated filer as the backend.

Oracle supports a Netapp Filer with NFSv4, and a specific set of
configurations.    they don't support anything else NFS last I heard.
whats good for Oracle is generally good for Postgres.

of course, Netapp Filer is some of the most expensive storage per
gigabyte you'll ever deal with.

--
john r pierce                                      37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "René Romero Benavides"
Date:
Subject: Re: design question - repeated updates on temp or perm table.
Next
From: "Sahagian, David"
Date:
Subject: trying to use CLUSTER