On 25/01/13 13:49, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> writes:
>> On 25/01/13 13:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Unless libR can be coerced into not screwing up our signal handlers,
>>> I'd say that PL/R is broken beyond repair. That would be unfortunate.
>
>> It looks like Joe has run into something similar with libR stealing
>> SIGINT, he reinstalls it. A simple patch along the same lines for
>> SIGUSR1 (attached) seems to fix the issue.
>
> This certainly is not good enough, for either signal. What happens if
> the signal arrives while libR still has control? These things being
> asynchronous with respect to the receiving backend, we certainly can't
> assume that that won't happen.
>
> Why does libR think it should be messing with these handlers in the
> first place?
>
>
Agreed - I will see if I can work out why.
Cheers
Mark
