On 12/13/2012 05:42 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> And it looks like it all may be starting to go south here:
>> -> Hash Join (cost=9337.97..18115.71 rows=34489 width=244) (actual
time=418.054..1156.453rows=205420 loops=1)
>> Hash Cond: (customerdetails.customerid = entity.id)
Well, it looks like it's choosing a join order that's quite a bit
different from the way the query is expressed, so the OP might need to
play around with forcing the join order some.
cheers
andrew