Re: pg_ctl reload -o "...." - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_ctl reload -o "...."
Date
Msg-id 50A559F2.6020103@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl reload -o "...."  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl reload -o "...."  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/15/2012 03:41 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Is there a reason pg_ctl reload shouldn't honor -o ?
>> -o means "pass these switches on the postmaster's command line".
>> If you're not restarting the postmaster, you don't get to change
>> its command line.
> OK.  You see pg_ctl as a wrapper around postmaster, while I was
> viewing it as a thing in itself.


You're possibly not aware of its history. Before 8.0 it was a shell 
script and its use was seen as rather optional. IIRC there was even some 
debate about whether or not we needed it at all for the original Windows 
port (luckily Bruce and I thought we did, and made it happen.)


cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] Add support for a generic wal reading facility dubbed XLogReader