Am 30.10.2012 02:06, schrieb rodrigo@paripassu.com.br:
> BTW, 200 seems alwfully high unless a *really* high end machine. Â You
>> may have fewer timeouts if you avoid swamping the server with a
>> "thundering herd" of requests.
I was maintaining a setup which had > 1000 connections on a not very
high-end server (12GB of Ram). It was just most of the connections were
idling most the time. Tomcat with a high number of consistent
connections for some reasons and end user stand alone clients which are
establishing a database connection on startup and keeping them until
shutdown.
Cheers,
Frank
