Re: problems with large objects dump - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Marcos Ortiz
Subject Re: problems with large objects dump
Date
Msg-id 5077478B.5040509@uci.cu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: problems with large objects dump  (Sergio Gabriel Rodriguez <sgrodriguez@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance

On 10/11/2012 05:46 PM, Sergio Gabriel Rodriguez wrote:
Hi, 
    I tried with Postgresql 9.2 and the process used to take almost a day and a half, was significantly reduced to 6 hours, before failing even used to take four hours. My question now is, how long should it take the backup for a 200GB database with 80% of large objects?
Regards, Sergio.
That´s depends of several things.


Hp proliant Xeon G5
32 GB RAM
OS SLES 10 + logs --> raid 6
data-->raid 6
Can you share your postgresql.conf here?
Which filesystem are you using for your data directory?
What options are you using to do the backup?


thanks!

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Sergio Gabriel Rodriguez <sgrodriguez@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
 You wouldn't happen to be
trying to use a 9.0 or later pg_dump would you?  Exactly what 8.4.x
release is this, anyway?



Tom, thanks for replying, yes, we tried it with postgres postgres 9.1 and 9.2 and the behavior is exactly the same. The production version is 8.4.9

Greetings, 

sergio. 



--

Marcos Luis Ortíz Valmaseda
about.me/marcosortiz
@marcosluis2186



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: problems with large objects dump
Next
From: Sergey Konoplev
Date:
Subject: Re: Drawbacks of create index where is not null ?