On 09/27/2012 12:50 PM, Ryan Kelly wrote:
> What do you mean by "fewer faster cores"? Wouldn't "more faster cores"
> be better?
>
I believe his point is core does not equal cpu.
Too often I've watched cpu performance meters with one core pegged and
the other(s) idle, since really it's one cpu. I suspect it comes down
to: if your cpu bound, you're cpu bound and the other core(s) can't help.
