Re: build farm machine using mixed results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: build farm machine using mixed results
Date
Msg-id 504CB9A7.5040004@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: build farm machine using mixed results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: build farm machine using mixed results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/09/2012 11:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. I am going to add a config parameter to the buildfarm to allow
>> parallelism for the "make" and "make contrib" stages, but I'm not going
>> to release it until this is fixed.
> Well, why don't we stick .NOTPARALLEL in there for the moment, and then
> if Peter thinks of a better solution, he can revert that change in favor
> of something cleaner.


Works for me

>
> I assume we need this for all active branches, if the buildfarm is
> going to be stressing it?
>
>             

I can restrict it to only modern branches. Didn't we supposedly improve 
support for this during the 9.1 cycle? That seems like a sensible place 
to go back to.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: embedded list v2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: build farm machine using mixed results