Re: build farm machine using mixed results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: build farm machine using mixed results
Date
Msg-id 23724.1347205854@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: build farm machine using mixed results  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: build farm machine using mixed results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 09/09/2012 11:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I assume we need this for all active branches, if the buildfarm is
>> going to be stressing it?

> I can restrict it to only modern branches. Didn't we supposedly improve 
> support for this during the 9.1 cycle? That seems like a sensible place 
> to go back to.

Mmm, yeah, the commit history shows several different fixes for parallel
make back in the 9.1 time frame.  I doubt we want to try back-porting
all that work.  Let's just say 9.1 and up, then.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: build farm machine using mixed results
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XLogReader v2