Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Rikard Pavelic
Subject Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows
Date
Msg-id 502BA62B.6070408@zg.htnet.hr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows  (Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>)
Responses Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 15.8.2012. 3:54, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 11:42 PM, Rikard Pavelic wrote:
>> On 8.8.2012. 13:30, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2012 06:24 PM, rikard.pavelic@zg.htnet.hr wrote:
>>>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>>>
>>>> Bug reference:      7485
>>>> Logged by:          Rikard Pavelic
>>>> Email address:      rikard.pavelic@zg.htnet.hr
>>>> PostgreSQL version: 9.2 beta3
>>>> Operating system:   Windows
>>>> Description:
>>>>
>>>> This is still an issue as reported in
>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2012-05/msg00231.php
>
>>> - How you installed PostgeSQL (ie the EnterpriseDB installer, from source, .zip install)
>> I've used EnterpriseDB installer (9.2 beta2 with this bug, and now 9.2 beta3)
>
>>> - The error message you are getting and the command(s) that cause it
>> ERROR: could not set up XML error handler
>> SQL state: 0A000
>> Hint: This probably indicates that the version of libxml2 being used is not compatible with the libxml2 header files
thatPostgreSQL was built with. 
>> I'm calling function with type that has an XML attribute.
>> I can provide a test case, but since this is just a warning of the old bug I didn't.
>
> OK, I get you.
>
> Given the context of the old report this sounds like it could be an installation/packaging issue. I'll ping the EDB
folks.
>
> Which Windows is it exactly? And did you use the 32-bit or 64-bit installer?
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
Windows 7 64bit
PostgreSQL 9.2beta3, compiled by Visual C++ build 1600, 64-bit

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #7494: WAL replay speed depends heavily on the shared_buffers size
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #7494: WAL replay speed depends heavily on the shared_buffers size