Re: New email address - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: New email address
Date
Msg-id 4ceb46ce1c1f3f0ff52b6f2eef2de292@thebighonker.lerctr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New email address  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: New email address  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: New email address  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-11-24 13:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>>> change the From header (and add a Reply-To, so replies still work).
> 
>> If this were done, would the other steps (not changing the subject
>> or body of the email) be necessary?
> 
> See my followup: I think it's probably true that we could skip those
> changes.  But Rudy commented that there's a lot of underdocumented
> subtlety here.  There might be reasons I'm missing why we'd need to
> stop doing those things.  It doesn't seem like DMARC as such would
> force that, but perhaps those things trigger some popular antispam
> heuristics.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
Any Header or Body changes will invalidate most, if not all, DKIM 
signatures.  Since DKIM is used as part
of DMARC, it's a problem.

Not sure what MajorDomo2 will allow you to do.


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 7011 W Parmer Ln, Apt 1115, Austin, TX 78729-6961



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New email address
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Revisiting pg_stat_statements and IN() (Was: Re: pg_stat_statements fingerprinting logic and ArrayExpr)