On 2013-05-10 10:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> On 2013-05-10 09:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... and verify you get a cheap plan for each referencing table.
>
> We don't :(
>
> Ugh. I bet the problem is that in some of these tables, there are lots
> and lots of duplicate account ids, such that seqscans look like a good
> bet when searching for an otherwise-unknown id. You don't see this
> with a handwritten test for a specific id because then the planner can
> see it's not any of the common values.
>
> 9.2 would fix this for you --- any chance of updating?
>
> regards, tom lane
I'll see what we can do. I was looking for a reason, this may be it.
Thanks for all your help.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893