Hi,
On 10/1/20 9:41 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 03:03:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hmm. I still think that knowing at least about a FPW could be an
>> interesting piece of information even here. Anyway, instead of
>> copying a logic that exists already in xlog_outrec(), why not moving
>> the block information print into a separate routine out of the
>> WAL_DEBUG section, and just reuse the same format for the context of
>> the redo error callback? That would also be more consistent with what
>> we do in pg_waldump where we don't show the fork name of a block when
>> it is on a MAIN_FORKNUM. And this would avoid a third copy of the
>> same logic. If we add the XID, previous LSN and the record length
>> on the stack of what is printed, we could just reuse the existing
>> routine, still that's perhaps too much information displayed.
> Seeing nothing, I took a swing at that, and finished with the
> attached that refactors the logic and prints the block information as
> wanted. Any objections to that?
Sorry for the late reply and thanks for looking at it!
Had a look at it and did a few tests: looks all good to me.
No objections at all, thanks!
Bertrand
> --
> Michael
