On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 03:03:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hmm. I still think that knowing at least about a FPW could be an
> interesting piece of information even here. Anyway, instead of
> copying a logic that exists already in xlog_outrec(), why not moving
> the block information print into a separate routine out of the
> WAL_DEBUG section, and just reuse the same format for the context of
> the redo error callback? That would also be more consistent with what
> we do in pg_waldump where we don't show the fork name of a block when
> it is on a MAIN_FORKNUM. And this would avoid a third copy of the
> same logic. If we add the XID, previous LSN and the record length
> on the stack of what is printed, we could just reuse the existing
> routine, still that's perhaps too much information displayed.
Seeing nothing, I took a swing at that, and finished with the
attached that refactors the logic and prints the block information as
wanted. Any objections to that?
--
Michael
