Re: Partitioning by status? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Partitioning by status?
Date
Msg-id 4F108094.4070401@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioning by status?  (alexandre - aldeia digital <adaldeia@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioning by status?  (alexandre - aldeia digital <adaldeia@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 1/13/12 2:44 AM, alexandre - aldeia digital wrote:
>>
>> Also, (2) only really works if you're going to obsolesce (remove)
>> archive records after a certain period of time.  Otherwise the
>> sub-partitioning hurts performance.
>>
>
> Is there any moves to include the "easy" table partitioning in the 9.2
> version ?

Nobody has been submitting patches.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: alexandre - aldeia digital
Date:
Subject: Discovering the most searched values for a field
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Discovering the most searched values for a field