Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date
Msg-id 4F040137020000250004430C@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs  wrote:
> My focus was on getting something working first, then tuning. If
> we're agreed that we have everything apart from the tuning then we
> can proceed with tests to see which works better.
Sure.  I just think you are there already except for what I got into.
FWIW, moving the modulus application out of the loop is a very
trivial change and has no affect on the results; it's strictly a
performance issue.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2