> embedded in often-executed plpgsql functions, for instance. Can you
> identify which table the lseeks are issued against?
I wouldn't know how? I'm just using htop and "s" on the postgres process
to find these...
> (Now, having said that, I don't see how that type of theory explains no
> CPU load.
My bad sorry. I was relaying information from the guy administering the
server. It turns out that "no CPU load" really meant: only one of the
cores is being utilized. On a 16 core machine that looks like "no load"
but of course for the individual query still means 100%.
> But you're really going to need to provide more info before
> anyone can explain it, and finding out what the lseeks are on would be
> one good step.)
I have attached two of the offending execution plans. Anything obviously
wrong with them?
thank you for looking into it!
Sören
