Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Boreham
Subject Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
Date
Msg-id 4E88F4DB.4070306@boreham.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test  (Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>)
Responses Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test  (Gregory Gerard <ggerard@mac.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 10/2/2011 2:33 AM, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
>
>
> Given the fact that you can get two 320's for the price of one 710,
> its probably always a bit difficult to actually make the choice
> (unless you want a fixed amount of disks and the best endurance
> possible for that).

One thing I'd add to this is that the price/bit is more like 4X ($2k for
the 300G 710 vs $540 for the 300G 320).
The largest 710 drive is 300G whereas the largest 320 is 600G which may
imply that the 710's are twice
as over-provisioned as the 320. It may be that at present we're paying
2x for the relative over-provisioning
and another 2x to enjoy the better silicon and firmware. This hopefully
implies that prices will fall
in the future provided a credible competitor emerges (Hitachi??).







pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: David Boreham
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
Next
From: Gregory Gerard
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test