Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ideriha, Takeshi
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback
Date
Msg-id 4E72940DA2BF16479384A86D54D0988A565F5468@G01JPEXMBKW04
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

This feature hasn't been updated for a long time, 
but I've just been interested in this feature and looking into the mailing list.

From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> In short, you can't make fundamental changes in transactional behavior without
> enormous breakage.  That was the lesson we learned from the autocommit fiasco
> and I do not believe that it's inapplicable here.

I've just wanted to confirm what "autocommit fiasco" points out.
Are the below threads and git-log relevant discussion?
(If there are any other threads, could you please tell me the link?)

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3E54526A.121EBEE5%40tpf.co.jp#3E54526A.121EBEE5@tpf.co.jp 
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=f85f43dfb5b9043ea6b01d8b824c195cd7f9ed3c

Regards,
Takeshi Ideriha




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze)