Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Date
Msg-id 4E4D35CA.9030603@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/18/2011 10:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So how about adding a column to pg_stat_activity, progress_metrics or
> something like that, and add that information there.
>    

Adding a field here (I'd go for the simpler "progress") and updating it 
regularly would be a reasonable way to go here.  This data doesn't 
really need to go into the traditional statistics infrastructure to be 
useful.  I didn't start there because I was already getting pushback on 
overloading the stats collector with constantly updated metrics last 
time I did something in this area.  I wasn't going to try and argue why 
it was worth it in this case, just like I'm not going to argue about the 
complaint over the command string overhead being too high--just going to 
not do that instead.  If the bikeshed I built doesn't look fancy enough 
to hold the bike I put in there, I'm not going to build a better one 
right now--I'll just put a cheaper bike in there instead.

I was hoping to eventually take the useful summary bits at the end, the 
totals, and save those into statistics somewhere each time a VACUUM of 
either sort finishes.  It would fit with the information shown in 
pg_stat_tables, but that's obviously getting too wide.  Breaking out a 
pg_stat_autovacuum view that contains all the relevant bits currently 
shown in that view, plus these 3 new fields, would be a reasonable start.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost