Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
Date
Msg-id 4E1D584D.2070706@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Looking at the performance test results again on the wiki page 
(http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Fast_GiST_index_build_GSoC_2011#Testing_results), 
the patch can be summarized like this: it reduces the number of disk 
accesses, at the cost of some extra CPU work.

Is it possible to switch to the new buffering method in the middle of an 
index build? We could use the plain insertion method until the index 
grows to a certain size (effective_cache_size?), and switch to the 
buffering method after that.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christian Ullrich
Date:
Subject: Re: isolation tests are not being run in buildfarm
Next
From: Radosław Smogura
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch Review: Bugfix for XPATH() if text or attribute nodes are selected