On 15.06.2011 19:10, Kevin Grittner wrote: > There is one issue you raised in this post: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4DEF3194.6030305@enterprisedb.com > > Robert questioned whether it should be 9.1 material here: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/BANLkTint2i2fHDTdr=Xq3K=YrxegovGmTw@mail.gmail.com > > I posted a patch here: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4DEFB169020000250003E3BD@gw.wicourts.gov > > Should I put that patch into a 9.2 CF? Yeah. I've added it to the September commitfest. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных