Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers
Date
Msg-id 4DB0BD73.8090603@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/21/2011 12:39 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> In fact, I've been wondering if we shouldn't consider extending the
> support window for 8.2 past the currently-planned December 2011.
> There seem to be quite a lot of people running that release precisely
> because the casting changes in 8.3 were so painful, and I think the
> incremental effort on our part to extend support for another year
> would be reasonably small.

The pending EOL for 8.2 is the only thing that keeps me sane when 
speaking with people who refuse to upgrade, yet complain that their 8.2 
install is slow.  This last month, that seems to be more than usual "why 
does autovacuum suck so much?" complaints that would all go away with an 
8.3 upgrade.  Extending the EOL is not doing any of these users a 
favor.  Every day that goes by when someone is on a version of 
PostgreSQL that won't ever allow in-place upgrade is just making worse 
the eventual dump and reload they face worse.  The time spent porting to 
8.3 is a one-time thing; the suffering you get trying to have a 2011 
sized database on 2006's 8.2 just keeps adding up the longer you 
postpone it.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: best way to test new index?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: gincostestimate