Greg Smith wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 12:39 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > In fact, I've been wondering if we shouldn't consider extending the
> > support window for 8.2 past the currently-planned December 2011.
> > There seem to be quite a lot of people running that release precisely
> > because the casting changes in 8.3 were so painful, and I think the
> > incremental effort on our part to extend support for another year
> > would be reasonably small.
>
> The pending EOL for 8.2 is the only thing that keeps me sane when
> speaking with people who refuse to upgrade, yet complain that their 8.2
> install is slow. This last month, that seems to be more than usual "why
> does autovacuum suck so much?" complaints that would all go away with an
> 8.3 upgrade. Extending the EOL is not doing any of these users a
> favor. Every day that goes by when someone is on a version of
> PostgreSQL that won't ever allow in-place upgrade is just making worse
> the eventual dump and reload they face worse. The time spent porting to
> 8.3 is a one-time thing; the suffering you get trying to have a 2011
> sized database on 2006's 8.2 just keeps adding up the longer you
> postpone it.
Interesting. You could argue that once 8.3 is our earliest supported
release that we could even shrink the support window because the
argument "I can't dump/reload my data" would be gone.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
