Re: Build farm coverage for isolation tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Build farm coverage for isolation tests
Date
Msg-id 4DAEE76A.2090801@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Build farm coverage for isolation tests  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 04/20/2011 09:54 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  wrote:
>
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2011-04-20%2010%3A17%3A02&stg=isolation-check
>
> On a cursory scan, that looks like a successful run of the right
> test suite.  Was there anything in particular I should be checking
> there?

Not that I know of. I just gave you the URL a) to show it's actually 
being done and b) to show you what the output would be like.

>
>> I'll include this in the upcoming release of the buildfarm client.
>
> Thanks!
>
> This will only be attempted for 9.1 or higher, right?
>
>

Yes, The code checks for the existence of the isolation directory and 
only runs the step if it exists.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench \for or similar loop
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX vs broken HOT chains, redux