Re: Build farm coverage for isolation tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Build farm coverage for isolation tests
Date
Msg-id 4DAE9F5F020000250003CA57@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Build farm coverage for isolation tests  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Build farm coverage for isolation tests  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2011-04-20%2010%3A17%3A02&stg=isolation-check
On a cursory scan, that looks like a successful run of the right
test suite.  Was there anything in particular I should be checking
there?
> I'll include this in the upcoming release of the buildfarm client.
Thanks!
This will only be attempted for 9.1 or higher, right?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench \for or similar loop
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump --binary-upgrade vs. ALTER TYPE ... DROP ATTRIBUTE