Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Guillaume Lelarge
Subject Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Date
Msg-id 4D8A2A3C.7070709@lelarge.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le 23/03/2011 17:53, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>>> While working on adding support for SQL/Med objects to pgAdmin, I'm
>>> quite surprised to see there is no way to add comments to SQL/Med
>>> objects. Is this on purpose or is it just something that was simply missed?
> 
>> I think it's an oversight.  We should probably fix this.
> 
> Yeah, I had a private TODO about that.  I'd like to see if we can
> refactor the grammar to eliminate some of the duplication there
> as well as the potential for oversights of this sort.  I believe
> that USER MAPPINGs are missing from ObjectType as well as a bunch
> of other basic places ...
> 

OK, great. Thanks for your answers.


-- 
Guillaumehttp://www.postgresql.frhttp://dalibo.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: making write location work (was: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication)