On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh, did we decide to do it that way? OK with me, but the submitted docs
> are woefully inadequate on the point. This behavior is going to have to
> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
> about it :-().
I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is
going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the
patch is not going to be in 9.1. Does this sound acceptable?
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
