On 04.02.2011 14:30, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> The assertion in RecordFreeIndexPage() is a reasonable sanity
>> check, but I'm inclined to move it to the caller instead: I don't
>> think the FSM should need to access predicate lock manager, even
>> for an assertion.
>
> OK. So it looks like right now it will move to btvacuumpage(), right
> before the call to RecordFreeIndexPage(), and we will need to add it
> to one spot each in the GiST and GIN AMs, when we get to those.
> Would you like me to do that?
Yeah, please do. Thanks!
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
