Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
Date
Msg-id 4D3898660200002500039941@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Robert Haas  wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Kevin Grittner
>  wrote:
>> Robert Haas  wrote:
>>
>>> I think filtered is pretty clear and like it...
>>
>> I find it ambiguous. [Takes sip of filtered water.]
> 
> Oh, you mean water that had some things you didn't want taken out
> of it?
Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to
leave me with filtered water.  What's "filtered" in this case is what
was passed through, not what was removed.
I hadn't even thought about "filtered" as meaning the input to the
filtering process until Tom mentioned it, but on a different day, in
a different mood, it might also be what I assumed was meant by
"number filtered".
It's kinda hard to imagine a *more* ambiguous term.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: One Role, Two Passwords
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: One Role, Two Passwords