Re: Spread checkpoint sync - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Spread checkpoint sync
Date
Msg-id 4D35E635.7060807@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Spread checkpoint sync  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> To be frank, I really don't care about fixing this behavior on ext3,
> especially in the context of that sort of hack.  That filesystem is not
> the future, it's not possible to ever really make it work right, and
> every minute spent on pandering to its limitations would be better spent
> elsewhere IMHO.  I'm starting with the ext3 benchmarks just to provide
> some proper context for the worst-case behavior people can see right
> now, and to make sure refactoring here doesn't make things worse on it. 
> My target is same or slightly better on ext3, much better on XFS and ext4.

Please don't forget that we need to avoid performance regressions on
NTFS and ZFS as well.  They don't need to improve, but we can't let them
regress.  I think we can ignore BSD/UFS and Solaris/UFS, as well as
HFS+, though.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast