On 01/04/2011 07:51 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:28 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> The relevant question is: which configuration(s) can we have ready for
>> the next CommitFest and alpha release?
>
> Based upon that series of conversations, I've reworked the design so
> that there is (currently) only a single standby offering sync rep at any
> one time. Other standbys can request to be sync standbys but they only
> become the sync standby if the first one fails. Which was simple to do
> and bridges the challenges of an exactly identified sync standby and the
> fragility of too closely specifying the config.
ah cool - like that approach for 9.1!
Thanks for working on that!
Stefan
