All,
So, I've been doing some reading about this issue, and I think
regardless of what other changes we make we should never enable O_DIRECT
automatically on Linux, and it was a mistake for us to do so in the
first place.
First, in the Linux docs for open():
=========
In summary, O_DIRECT is a potentially powerful tool that should be used
with caution. It is recommended that applications treat use of O_DIRECT
as a performance option which is disabled by default.
=========
Second, Linus has a quote about O_DIRECT that I think should serve as an
indicator to us that directIO will never be beneficial-by-default on
Linux, and might even someday be desupported:
============
The right way to do it is to just not use O_DIRECT.
The whole notion of "direct IO" is totally braindamaged. Just say no.
This is your brain: OThis is your brain on O_DIRECT: .
Any questions?
I should have fought back harder. There really is no valid reason for EVER
using O_DIRECT. You need a buffer whatever IO you do, and it might as well
be the page cache. There are better ways to control the page cache than
play games and think that a page cache isn't necessary.
So don't use O_DIRECT. Use things like madvise() and posix_fadvise()
instead.
Linus
=============
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
