Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of vie dic 03 16:45:59 -0300 2010:
> ALTER TABLE table_name SET PRIMARY KEY USING INDEX index_name. Quite
> verbose, but imho USING makes it much more clear that it's an existing
> index.
I was going to post the same thing (well except I was still thinking in
ADD PRIMARY KEY rather than SET PRIMARY KEY). I think SET is better
than ADD in that it is a bit different from the syntax that makes it
create a new index. On the other hand, it could also be pointlessly
annoying.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
