Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Date
Msg-id 4CADBB410200002500036644@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
List pgsql-performance
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> perhaps it would be possible by, say, increasing the number of
> lock partitions by 8x.  It would be nice to segregate these issues
> though, because using pread/pwrite is probably a lot less work
> than rewriting our lock manager.

You mean easier than changing this 4 to a 7?:

#define LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS  4

Or am I missing something?

-Kevin

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field
Next
From: Aaron Turner
Date:
Subject: large dataset with write vs read clients